Official Site of Speaker, Historian and Author Sean Munger

Beowulf is Boring, Fiction, TV, Writing Craft

Bobby Ewing in the Shower: An Epic Storytelling Gaffe.

This morning on Twitter I happened to be talking about bad 80s TV (thanks Gojiramonkey!), and that triggered an idea for a blog post somewhat related to last week’s post about how (and how not) to kill off characters in a story.

Does anybody remember this?

[Fast-forward to 3:35 for the relevant scene]

This, of course, is the 1985-86 season finale of the TV prime-time soap opera Dallas, which, if you remember the 80s, you know was a huge deal. The world ground to a halt on Friday nights when Dallas came on. Then we had this. After this bizarre audience shock moment, the show entered a slow and steady decline, until it was finally terminated at the end of the 1990-91 season.

So what’s the deal with Bobby Ewing in the shower? It was a storytelling gaffe of epic proportions–one of the most epic storytelling fails in popular culture, in my opinion.

Here’s what happened. Bobby Ewing was played by actor Patrick Duffy, who later went on to fame in the 90s sitcom Step by Step. Though he was a crucial part of the show, he decided to leave after the 1984-85 season, hoping to pursue other opportunities. The scriptwriters killed him off in particularly dramatic fashion, having him run down with a car while saving his wife Pam (played by Victoria Principal, who you see in the clip above).

Things evidently didn’t go as well for Mr. Duffy as he hoped. Sometime during the next run of the show he decided to return. But his character death was already an accomplished fact. So, they decided to bring him back–by having it turn out that the entirety of the 1985-86 season was a dream in Pam’s head!

Yes, you read that right. They used “it was all a dream.” The entire season. All 31 episodes. That meant for the 1986-87 season, they had to go back and pick up where they left off, or try to anyway.

Granted, this was 80s television. It’s not Shakespeare. But “it was all a dream”? Really? You just can’t use that in a story, any story, at least not under these circumstances. It worked in The Wizard of Oz movie version (it wasn’t in the book) because the dream was a frame story for Dorothy’s entrance into the fantasy world. And that could only work once. Nowadays, if you use dreams in a story you’d better have a good reason for it, and you’d better tell the audience straight-out that a character is dreaming. (The Christopher Nolan film Inception uses dreaming as a primary plot point, and it’s well done).

Okay, so let’s look at the factors that caused the producers and writers of Dallas to rationalize this egregious crime against the laws of good storytelling. Yes, they wanted Patrick Duffy back on the show. Yes, they probably felt there was a major economic factor–presumably Dallas was a more profitable commodity with Patrick Duffy than without him, or they wouldn’t have agreed to put him back on the show at all. And Dallas, unlike Star Trek–the previous example of a show where a key character is killed off but then brought back into the story–was not science fiction, so you can’t use some exotic means, whether technological, supernatural or spiritual, to bring him back to life.

The writers had also painted themselves into a corner at the end of the 1984-85 season. Bobby Ewing was killed on-screen, without any doubt what happened. They didn’t leave a question open, “Well, is he dead or isn’t he?” He was dead. No question.

Realistically, what were their options? There weren’t many good ones.

  • Twin Brother. Soap operas love to use this trope. A character turns out to have a secret twin nobody knew about; more often than not the twin turns out to be evil. Obviously this is groan-inducing, but honestly, is it worse than “it was all a dream”? Bobby, or pseudo-Bobby, could have been brought back into the story as a different character. Of course, they would have to explain where he’d been for the 30-odd years of his life before then and why none of the other characters in the Ewing family knew about him. Miss Ellie, the matriarch of the Ewing clan (played by Barbara Bel Geddes) would have some ‘splainin to do, for sure. But it might work. This raises the issue, though, of how Twin Bobby would affect the relationships among the other characters. According to the official Dallas website, they evidently filmed a version of this idea.
  • Faked His Death. Another soap opera trope, but hey, it was Dallas! Perhaps Bobby could be given a reason for having faked his death. I certainly don’t recall what the plot threads were at the end of the ’84-’85 season, but maybe he decided he was tired of Pam, tired of the Ewing clan and tired of their melodramatic antics week after week, so he’d gain freedom by shuffling off this mortal coil and running away to Mexico or something. Of course, because Bobby’s death was an accident, certain other characters would have to be in on the deception, and they would have to explain why Bobby, who was generally a positive and “good” character, would do something so surly. But again, it might work.
  • Near Death Experience. Bobby awakened in a mortuary, unsure of what happened or even who he was. Somehow he miraculously survived the car crash, but was left with semi-permanent amnesia. He escaped from Dallas unnoticed (this needs some explanation!), wandered in Mexico, lived the life of a drifter and finally his memory returned. Intent on reclaiming his life, he goes home like nothing ever happened, seeking to erase the whole episode from his memory. This could be interesting because, especially by giving Bobby a mental condition, you could make it so that perhaps he doesn’t even remember what happened, thus giving the characters a mystery to solve early in the season.
  • A Faux Murder? Here’s an idea, one that might have worked and might even have preserved the internal conflict among the characters. The villain of Dallas was J.R., played by Larry Hagman. Why not have J.R. decide to murder Bobby–but, because he’s his brother and his blood, instead of actually killing him, fake his death and force him to leave the country? You’d have to explain why Bobby would go along with this–J.R. had better have something really powerful to hold over his head if he didn’t cooperate–but there could be some interesting story material here.

None of these options are clean. All of them float dangerously close to the line of a story infraction so serious that viewers will never forgive you. But, in my opinion, each and every one of them is superior to “it was all a dream.”

In my book Beowulf is Boring, I included a glossary of terms at the end of the book, both historical/medieval terms and pop culture references that appear in the book (it’s a comedy mashup, in case you haven’t caught on). A character does use the phrase “Bobby Ewing in the shower.” Here’s how I define it, on page 232:

Bobby Ewing in the Shower. Pop culture term describing a resolution of a bad situation wherein one wakes up to find ‘it was only a dream.’ Refers to an infamous season finale cliffhanger resolution of the 1980s prime-time TV soap opera Dallas in which the character (portrayed by Patrick Duffy), having been killed on-screen a year before, appears to his wife in the shower and cheerfully bids her ‘Good morning!’ whereupon she realizes that the entire past season of the show was all a bad dream. The most egregious and improbable example of a deus ex machina.”

So what do you think? Am I too hard on Peter Dunne and Joel Fiegenbanm, the writers credited with writing the season 9 cliffhanger? Leave your comments here!

The image of Bobby Ewing from the 1986 Dallas finale is owned by Lorimar Telelpictures. I believe my inclusion of it here constitutes fair use.


  1. Wasn’t the show finale of Newhart revealed to be all just a dream?

    • Lynn

      @vasper85 – Yep, it sure was!! (Good call!!)

  2. Didn’t the show Newhart end with it all being some sort of crazy dream?

  3. sjogirl

    Yew Newhart copied Dallas (as a joke)…Bob woke up in bed with Suzanne Pleshette…it was awesome.

  4. Scolopendra

    Amusingly, going back to Star Trek, “Enterprise” ended with an ambiguous it-was-all-on-the-holodeck scene with characters from a previous series. The ambiguity centered around whether it was the final episode or the /entire series/ that was simulated “inaccurately.”

    • Yes, the medical drama “St. Elsewhere,” which went off the air in 1989, famously ended with a similar gag, the rather infamous “Tommy Westphal’s snow globe” ending. I think it’s a bit different when you’re doing a series ending as opposed to an ongoing episode, but you’re right that these sorts of endings are often attempted. I did one myself at the end of my book “Giamotti in Winter.”

  5. Unlike Newhart, which was brilliant, the Dallas storyline was a pathetic cop out and I was so disgusted with it (it felt like I had wasted hours watching a season of storylines that now did not matter) that I stopped watching it after that. They lost a faithful viewer with such a cheap cop out. ANY of the above suggested alternatives would have been better. I recall that, at the time, the TV Guide had a story about three or four possible endings that were being rumoured in LA. One was the dream and I recall saying there was no way they’d go for such a stupid and cheap cop out. I fully felt that he would come back as a twin. It would have been a better way to go.

  6. michelle

    Actually the case could be made that the previous season was dooming the show much faster by changing it too much . Some people felt that the new producers didn’t get Dallas and were taking it off the rails and the ” it was a Dream ” plot line and Patrick Duffy’s return helped put it back and kept it going longer then it would have . It ran for 5 more years , that’s over 100 episodes which is the mark of a very successful run for any show. It could be said that losing that season might have gave it those 5 years.

    • KL

      When they said in that TV guide that it was a dream, I thought that Pam dreamt Bobby in the shower, never crossed my mind that it would be the entire previous season!

  7. a guy who hangs around central

    jump the shark…..thats another tv phrase…..commence blog

    • dr susannah vyvoda

      some stories are rubbish but considering the absolute rubbish produced now on british TV ( one murder after another, constant 100 year old repeats ) dallas is quite watchable at least for the fashion . also knots landing is quite fun. the new dallas is as bad as any other new rubbish coming from usa. take a book and read ( its cheaper and healthier)

  8. Arnie Wuhrman

    I just came across this thread, and I know I’m adding to it way late — about a year since the last post. I just wanted to point out that, no matter how disappointing the “it was just a dream” vehicle was in Dallas, the ending of the Newhart series which everyone so praises — and rightly so; it was hilarious — would not have been possible without the Dallas vehicle. So I’m grateful for how Dallas handled it on that score alone, although I’m sure that’s not the goal that Dallas’s producers (or its investors) had in mind.

  9. Dallas was a soap opera, not a sitcom (situational comedy).

    • Right you are! Slip o’ the keyboard, and a moronic mistake on my part that I had not noticed for the 3 years this article has been up. Thanks for pointing it out–it’s corrected now.

  10. There is a fifth way the writers could have gone that probably would have changed the fundamental nature of the show, but (imho) in a good way. They could have brought Bobby back as a ghost!

    If they could have done this while avoiding the sitcom trap, it could have been great and original. I can’t think of a serious prime time drama before that time that had a ghost. If a prime time show had a ghost, it was automatically a comedy. The writers would have had to shoot for the right mix of drama and the uncanny, perhaps using the ghost as a metaphor for unresolved memories, guilt, psychological projection.

    That’s what I would have done anyway. You can take my word for it that it would have been great because no one has ever heard of me and fewer have read anything I’ve written.

  11. alan

    I was attending University at the time. I had My mother record all the episodes for me so I could watch them after the university year finished. So I collected the full Dallas season on VHS tape. The complete Dream Season. I have never forgiven the producers for wasting my time and my mother’s efforts in pampering my TV soap addiction.

  12. K Brown

    I don’t know how anyone could continue to watch the show after that. I’m just glad I wasn’t a fan.

  13. I found this post as well as your blog very entertaining.

  14. Love this entry as you know I’m a bit of a Dallas fan x Always thought it was a daft way to bring him back, but did miss Duffy a lot in the Dream season x Family Guy of course parodied this scene fantastically x Always thought that Mark Graison who married Pam in the dream season would rip off his face Scooby Doo style to reveal Bobby as the credits rolled x

  15. JustJenna

    My mom and I have never forgiven the writers for putting us through Bobby’s death for nothing. Biggest troll ever

  16. My mother was an avid Dallas fan, and she told me in the 90s about her concept for how Patrick Duffy’s Bobby Ewing could have been more effectively brought back to the show. Her idea was that Bobby had been severely injured–but, obviously, not killed–when Katherine Wentworth ran him down, and spent the next year in a coma. During that time, Pam and other characters visited his bedside and told him about events going on in Dallas, which became integrated into Bobby’s dream, along with his own imaginings. That would have enabled the writers to more reasonably do what they ended up doing anyway, which was to pick and choose which “dreamed” plotlines did or didn’t happen during that year. Obviously, if Pam had really dreamed the year in one night, none of the year’s events would have happened. But if Bobby had dreamed the year over the course of an actual year, informed by his loved ones, some of those events would have happened, others would not have, and some would have happened but with differences, which is what the writers decided to put on screen even though it didn’t fit their device.

  17. hdjas

    I’ve just thought of a 5th possible solution which would probably work just as badly as any. Maybe Bobby Ewing did die, but his wife developed some sort of psychotic breakdown and started to hallucinate about seeing him, He would show up to her in every episode, and she would go through many stages – believing he was not dead, wondering why no one else would talk to him, being diagnosed as mentally ill, believing it was a plot to separate them, and so on. But that would set a very grim tone to the soap opera, and hey, this was 1980s TV.

29 Pingbacks

  1. Retro Book Review: The Mystery of Chimney Rock (Choose Your Own Adventure). |
  2. SparklyPrettyBriiiight | Falling Skies: Review of “Strange Brew” (S3, E8)
  3. Anatomy of a cliffhanger: the “Law of Negligent Compounding Peril.” [includes video] |
  4. Signaling the End: When Fans Know the End is Near | Rummage This
  5. Looking Sideways Into the Future: What I Noticed in Comics in 2013 and the Years Ahead — The Beat
  6. Looking Sideways Into the Future: What I Noticed in Comics in 2013 and the Years Ahead | ComicBookRAW
  7. Looking Sideways Into the Future: What I Noticed in Comics in 2013 and the Years Ahead | Webcomic Directory Webcomics Guide
  8. “A Sweet Trip” | Nutrition U
  9. Jumping the shark
  10. X-Men: Days of Future Past | Why Bother?
  11. Death to the boring author website: long live the Revolution! |
  12. 30 Days of Nano: Day Nine | Lynsey White
  13. God from the Machine - Dustin Staiger
  14. 151 Bet | England cricket is like EastEnders
  15. England cricket is like EastEnders | CL-UAT
  16. England cricket is like EastEnders |
  17. Throwback Thursday: A night out in Manhattan…in 1985! |
  18. It’s Tommy Westphall’s world: The famous snow-globe ending of “St. Elsewhere.” |
  19. Guardians of the Galaxy S01 E07: The Backstabbers | Biff Bam Pop!
  20. Start up: Facebook’s real origin, Apple’s political underspend, Samsung’s unbranding, the electric oil crisis, and more | The Overspill: when there's more that I want to say
  21. Post Week in Review: Schallert, The Simpsons, and a Summer of Beer and Chicken Fingers –
  22. Inferno Revisited and Genetic Illiteracy | PLOS Blogs Network
  23. Really, ‘Judge Parker’? ‘Three months’ later? THREE MONTHS LATER? | Ephemereality
  24. TNG: Eye of the beholder. Det där Deanna Troi ser spöken. – Star Trek-athon
  25. DS9: The Search Pt 2. Det där Odo räddar alfakvadranten. – Star Trek-athon
  26. No. 306: On root beer, cleantech, Adelphi grads and The Spur’s plans for a summer of love - Innovate Long Island
  27. retcons and gamechangers – Just another WordPress site
  28. (To) Kill (or not to kill) Your Darlings | Gwen Jones Writes
  29. This Week in Comics: The Batman News Staff Talks About Every Bat-Book from 12/5/18 | Batman News

Comments are Closed

Theme by Anders Norén